May 10, 2005, 08:15 PM // 20:15
|
#2
|
Frost Gate Guardian
|
On a Mesmer it isn't the most useful attribute ever, because of changes made to most of the Mesmer's interrupting spells (namely making most only take less than a second to cast). But it is extremely useful for Elementalist (>6 second AOE spells), Necromancer (Numerous high casting time spells), and Monks (>6 second Ressurects).
|
|
|
May 10, 2005, 08:26 PM // 20:26
|
#3
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: In the between.
Guild: Heros Etc.
Profession: Me/N
|
As a Me/N, I have zero points in Fast Cast at the moment. (I'm Illusion/Blood/Inspiration.)
Once I have some more useful skills in the curses or death lines, I'll respec to take advantage of Fast Cast. But for right now, 90% of the Blood Spells I use have low cast time, so it's pointless. But if I were raising minions or casting high power curses then I'd want it.
Now... if you were a Me/E fast cast would be just about the greatest thing ever.
|
|
|
May 10, 2005, 10:24 PM // 22:24
|
#4
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Apr 2005
Profession: Mo/
|
some domination skills have fairly long casting times, cant think of what they are but i played a me/mo like crazy in all of the bwe, and i definitely noticed it.
also, if you are up against another mesmer, it lowers the chances that you will get interrupted. so i'd suggest putting your extra points into fast casting.
|
|
|
May 10, 2005, 11:04 PM // 23:04
|
#5
|
Ascalonian Squire
|
I sort of have this same dilemma as well. I've played both mes/nec and nec/mes to ~lvl 10 or so, and like them both. Fast casting dosen't have as pronounced effect as soul reaping does, and I sort of "assume" fast casting is working even though it doesn't seem very strong. Anyone know what the gain in fast casting is per point spent in it?
Anyways, sorry to hijack, but I'm wondering if any seasoned players could lay some facts down about the pros and cons of mesmer or necro as a primary class (mostly pve at this point).
|
|
|
May 11, 2005, 08:33 AM // 08:33
|
#6
|
Ascalonian Squire
|
I have been thinking about a mesmer as well - but fast casting didn't seem very appealing. How would an elementalis/mesmer work out? In priority I would play a mesmer, but I would use the high energy of an elementalist.
|
|
|
May 11, 2005, 02:31 PM // 14:31
|
#7
|
Ascalonian Squire
|
I play Me/E and use long cast time AOE spells of an elementalist
When I team up with other elementalists, they always complain that I kill things (cast faster) so that they can't do anything :P
but... in PvP, fire AOE is kinda not as effective as against PvE...
and Air or Water don't have that long casting time...
|
|
|
May 11, 2005, 03:41 PM // 15:41
|
#8
|
Frost Gate Guardian
|
I would never trade in storage for fast cast, and I would never use fire, so fast casting to me is pretty much worthless.
Me with Wiz/Mez and my friend with mez/wiz have been side by side, same lvl, same progress.. most of the game, both with earth and inspire and me with air thrown in, and we both had lvl 5 or 6 in energy/fast cast and I dont know why, but to me my char just feels more powerful than his.
I think a lot of it is the extra energy supply being just better than fast cast. With fast cast, assuming a mez/wiz dedicated a slot to mana tap, to try and compete in mana with the wiz/mez, forsaking the benefits of fast cast due to more spells being required from the mez/wiz vs the wiz/mez, the wiz/mez I am pretty sure would still win out.
Tsunamii Starshine
|
|
|
May 11, 2005, 04:09 PM // 16:09
|
#9
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cincy
Profession: Me/E
|
As usual, playstyle is the answer.
I prefer fast casting over energy storage. My thoughts are being faster always helps but lasting longer only helps when you need to last longer. (I hope this never gets taken out of context).
If you want to play a blaster-esque role then I would expect a Me/E to get better burst DPS but the E/Me to get better sustained DPS.
|
|
|
May 11, 2005, 05:33 PM // 17:33
|
#10
|
Ascalonian Squire
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerpow
As usual, playstyle is the answer.
I prefer fast casting over energy storage. My thoughts are being faster always helps but lasting longer only helps when you need to last longer. (I hope this never gets taken out of context).
If you want to play a blaster-esque role then I would expect a Me/E to get better burst DPS but the E/Me to get better sustained DPS.
|
I should have went Me/E instead of E/Me, lol
Doing insane burst DPS is something that's very appealing to me, even if I have to dump all my mana at once to do it. You think it will matter if you're out of mana when everything on the screen is dead? Or would it matter that the E/X you just finished off still had 50 mana left when he died? Being able to spam those 5e 1s spells really quickly would be a plus too. Flare spam would own :>
I want to see how a Me/E would do with 10 FC / 10 Air / 10 Dom. That would rule. Or even 10 FC / 10 Air / 10 Ins. The energy/life steal would come alot faster if you ran into trouble (both of those spells are annoyingly long to cast when you *really* need them)
|
|
|
May 11, 2005, 09:40 PM // 21:40
|
#11
|
Just Plain Fluffy
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Berkeley, CA
Guild: Idiot Savants
|
Fast Casting Mesmer/Elementalists are awful. There really isn't a good way to put it - you give up the hat and superior rune to grab fast casting, and that does awful, awful things to your damage output.
The short answer is that you need ten in Fast Casting to deal the same DPS with a Mesmer/Ele as with an Ele/* with the Superior. That's just to get the same damage per second - you're still going to run into cooldown walls, you're still burning through energy much faster than the ele, and you just don't have the damage to show for it. Get up into the 13, 14 Fast Casting range and there might be a debate, but until then, there simply is none.
On a character that wants to use 2-3 second cast time Mesmer skills (Backfire and friends), I like Fast Casting a lot in the 7-9 base attribute range. It's also rather nice when comboed with long cast skills like the various Resses. As mentioned it does not help with interrupts much at all, and it generally isn't so good that you want to dump a ton of points into it. But it's definitely worth using.
Just don't waste your time on the Mes/Ele nuker please.
Peace,
-CxE
__________________
Don't argue with idiots. They bring you to their level and beat you with experience.
|
|
|
May 11, 2005, 10:08 PM // 22:08
|
#12
|
Ascalonian Squire
|
Since I’m not to concerned with PvE I went with Me/N over N/Me for the fast casting just in case. It will be fun to play with even if I don’t end up sticking with it.
|
|
|
May 11, 2005, 10:24 PM // 22:24
|
#13
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: FL.orida.
Profession: W/Mo
|
the fast casting is only good for pure Mesmers or Me/E anything else its just a waste to use and it is only good to have like 3-5 fast casting
|
|
|
May 12, 2005, 02:34 PM // 14:34
|
#14
|
Frost Gate Guardian
|
Here's my take on fast casting.
1. Less time to cast means the sooner the skill will recharge for use.
2. When doing something such as running from the enemy, it helps to have fast cast so you can quicky go on about your business without getting hit too much or at all. (On warriors or even anyon chasing me, I can usually stack 2-3 hexes easily without getting hit when they're chasing me with imagined burden in a single chain. lvl 8+ fast cast)
3. Counter-casting
I would only put skills into fast casting really if you're a pure mesmer build.
The biggest reason is just simply dishing out spells/skills a lot quicker than others. You'll definately notice the difference when you put more points into it.
|
|
|
May 12, 2005, 06:19 PM // 18:19
|
#15
|
Ascalonian Squire
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Molvania
the fast casting is only good for pure Mesmers or Me/E anything else its just a waste to use and it is only good to have like 3-5 fast casting
|
Wouldn't a mesmer/necro build benefit quite well from some points in fast casting? Necro spells generally have long casting times, depending on which ones you're using. I chose mes/nec over nec/mes because I feel like I can survive a little bit longer by getting off important spells faster. Maybe it's all in my head, I dunno. Those points spent in fast casting are sure hard to part with I'll tell you that
|
|
|
May 13, 2005, 05:55 PM // 17:55
|
#16
|
Krytan Explorer
|
I wouldn't say that...for example I made a very nice nuker dual attunement build with Mesmer primary and fast casting as the base of its large DPS. Fast casting is a creative skill, it makes skills useful...like Arcane Conundrum or erm...Energy Tap.
|
|
|
May 14, 2005, 09:30 PM // 21:30
|
#17
|
Ascalonian Squire
|
Ensign, Can you explain the hat and superior rune comment? I don't know what you are talking about.
|
|
|
May 15, 2005, 01:52 AM // 01:52
|
#18
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta,GA
|
He's referring to the headgear that often adds 1 attribute point (available for your unique attribute) as well as adding a superior rune (+3) to that.
|
|
|
May 15, 2005, 02:06 AM // 02:06
|
#19
|
Just Plain Fluffy
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Berkeley, CA
Guild: Idiot Savants
|
Basically a primary class attribute can be pumped to 16 using the appropriate +1 headgear and a superior rune (+3), while a secondary class attribute is limited to whatever its natural level is. Thus an Elementalist/Mesmer can have 16 in Fire Magic, while a Mesmer/Elementalist can only have a 12 in Fire Magic, and so forth.
Just for the sake of comparison, look at Fireball. An Ele/Mesmer is casting it at level 16, dealing 119 damage per cast - the Mesmer/Elementalist is casting it at level 12, for 91 damage per cast. The former takes 2.75 seconds total to cast - the latter has a variable casting time due to Fast Casting, but at a fairly typical level 10 it'd have a casting time of 2.05 seconds.
Just on pure DPS, the Elementalist is getting 43.27 DPS from his Fireballs, while the Mesmer is getting 44.39. So the two are fairly comparable on those grounds alone.
But then you have to take energy costs into account. While they're getting similar DPS figures, the Elementalist is only spending 5.45 Energy per second on that Fireball, while the Mesmer is spending 7.31. On top of that the cooldowns work in the Elementalist's favor - they can chain cast using fewer skills as their spells take longer, while the Mesmer ends up needing to fit in more to always have something available.
Plus Energy Storage.
It's a cute strategy at low levels when hats and runes aren't available, but once you get to higher levels, have access to major runes or better, and generally start approaching optimal strategy, the Mesmer/Elementalist quickly becomes useless.
Peace,
-CxE
__________________
Don't argue with idiots. They bring you to their level and beat you with experience.
|
|
|
May 15, 2005, 06:13 AM // 06:13
|
#20
|
Site Contributor
|
That's all great on calculator, but what Ensign fails to mention is that in PvP, the speed at which you deliver spells matters a lot. Let's say you have fast casting at 10, you can cast a Phoenix in 2 seconds, as opposed to the usual 3 second cast. That essentially lets you put in another 1second spell in the time it takes the E/Me to cast one Phoenix. It makes a huge difference when you are stacking hexes on an enemy and can manage to stack 3 in the time it normally takes to stack 2.
And cooldown problems can be easily avoided by chaining a power drain spell in between casts. You are denying the enemy energy and refilling yours while the E/Me is still casting. After several spells, the time saved really starts to add up.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
Batou of Nine |
The Campfire |
14 |
Dec 23, 2005 01:30 AM // 01:30 |
Quinn |
Questions & Answers |
6 |
Nov 29, 2005 12:16 PM // 12:16 |
Molteor |
Questions & Answers |
2 |
Jun 09, 2005 09:28 PM // 21:28 |
Improves casting speed using Fast Casting skills?
|
mrflippy |
Questions & Answers |
2 |
May 18, 2005 11:46 AM // 11:46 |
howler |
Questions & Answers |
4 |
May 04, 2005 03:58 PM // 15:58 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:43 AM // 04:43.
|